What is a Dissertation Methodology Examples 10 Topic with Essay? The methodology section will be the article that you write following your literature review. After you have researched and discovered the gap in the available literature, you can create ideas for your proposed research.
In your research proposal, you will have had a suggested methodology where; you would have given ideas about how to approach the research; this would have been either through a primary data approach or through collecting secondary data. Before discussing the topic of Dissertation Methodology Examples with essays we just take look at types of data. The following types of data;
Primary data is any form of evidence that you collect yourself through; your research in the form of surveys, interviews, questionnaires, focus groups, observations, experiments. Also, Primary data collection methods do not involve the collection of data from other researchers’ work and their studies.
Collecting secondary data is the collection of evidence from previous researchers’ work. An example could be focusing on another researchers’ experiment and using their findings as a basis for your dissertation. An example could be collecting the findings from two different experiments and comparing the findings of these studies about the question posed.
Once you have decided what type of data you will be collecting; you will then need to determine whether the data being collected is qualitative or quantitative as this will have an impact on the analysis of your research.
We have provided the selection of examples of methodology dissertation topics below to help and inspire you.
Furthering the hypothesis that choosing the correct interviewing technique (or techniques) is a vital prerequisite to the attainment of quality primary research data; this dissertation offers a comparative critique of four interviewing techniques and scenarios. They are; face-to-face interviews versus email interviews, structured versus semi-structured interviews, individual interviews versus group interviews, and open versus closed questioning techniques. Having used secondary data to assess the relative strengths and merits of each; the second part of the dissertation will then conduct a ‘fictitious’ study upon ‘perceptions of Norwich as a romantic weekend holiday destination’ and will conduct interviews using each of the aforementioned techniques. Through so doing, the study will be able to offer a series of reasoned comments as to which interviewing technique was most useful for the given study area.
As a mechanism through which to quantify primary data, especially within the social sciences, a Likert scale is an oft-used tool. Whilst this dissertation advances the view that quantitative data is superior to qualitative (a contention discussed within the study); it nevertheless posits, that improvements could make to the Likert scale. In so doing, it suggests that a fundamental weakness exists within the scale as a consequence of its usage of terms such as ‘agree strongly’ for such phrases are nebulous concepts. The result is that, whilst 80% of respondents may ‘strongly agree’; there may be substantial variations amongst the respondents as to what ‘strongly agree’ specifically means.
To many, the work of Alan Bryman has been pivotal to their studies. Offering a range of key texts on issues relating to methodology and ethics within research; Bryman is an acknowledged guru of research techniques within the social sciences, particularly within the United Kingdom. However, not all agree that, without Bryman, a research methodology bibliography is ‘not complete’. This dissertation addresses some of the questions raised by authors such as Leahey and Tashakkori; who contend that mixed methods research can be anomalous as it attempts to cross the qualitative/quantitative divide.
Amongst the social sciences, there appears to exist an almost institutional doctrinal expectation that all primary research must underpin by reference to either the work of Michel Foucault or Karl Marx, both ‘sacred cows’ in theoretical studies. This dissertation takes issue with this assumption and in so doing reviews the doctoral theses of Geography Ph.D. students from the years 1950-1960 and those of 1999-2009 as held within the libraries of the universities of York, Durham, Newcastle, and Leeds. In so doing it notes the theories within them and suggests that the present-day preoccupation with ‘shoehorning’ Foucauldian or Marxian theory into the methodology of each dissertation detracts from a wider academic ground.
As “a theory of existence concerning the status of the world and what populates it”, ontological research advances concerning pedagogy by educationalists who posit that ‘reality’ is evaluated by two broad assumptions: ‘interpretivism’ and ‘realism’. Combining these theoretical assumptions and philosophical definitions, this dissertation evaluates the methods currently being applied to assessing pedagogy and determines; which approach best suits this area. Accordingly, it also examines the value of epistemological research methods and considers the merits of both approaches. Finally, it investigates how much ‘learning’ is actually ‘knowing’; and how much the methodology in pedagogy has affected the understanding of ‘learning’.
Hamlyn posits that epistemology is concerned with “the nature of knowledge, its possibility, scope, and general basis”. In applying such concepts to pedagogical issues and wider educational research, Pring furthers that epistemology is, resultantly, a concept upon which individual researchers can adopt different (but logical) positions. This dissertation debates the theoretical research viewpoints of epistemology with interpretivism and non-interpretivism and in so doing furthers existing academic debate such as that advanced by Crotty that reality ‘comes into existence in and out of our engagement with the realities of our world’, rather than existing independently of peoples’ thinking.
Qualitative research evolves out of a pursuit of phenomenological data that provides evidence of particular behaviors, occurrences, and perspectives. Traditionally employing a greater emphasis on sociological techniques for its investigative process; a qualitative approach can therefore generate relevant findings retrieved from fundamentally complex scenarios. This dissertation reviews existing literature on the merits and weaknesses of qualitative data and in so doing seeks to make its contribution to research within the social sciences more accessible to the general reader. Thus this is a dissertation that involves close textual referencing and will require the writer to explain complex methodological issues clearly and concisely.
Walliman asserts that interviews are a useful method of obtaining both information and opinions from experts during the early stages of a research project. However, Sarantakos warns that the process of interviewing can affect by many diverse problems, leading to errors. These problems generally tend to associate with the nature of the method used; which includes data recording, evaluation, and instruction errors. This dissertation accordingly, therefore, also discusses the proactive steps that researchers can take to recognize potential errors and mitigate them. This is a dissertation that would be ideal for a researcher who has previously conducted research using interviews.
This dissertation notes that several ethical issues can arise during conducting primary social research, particularly “to prevent harming or wronging others”. Accordingly, it further notes that the best advice for the researcher is to be constantly ethically aware and to ensure that the ‘meaning and justification of moral consideration which underlies research’ are always apparent. Working with specific reference to the ethical considerations that arise when interviewing vulnerable members of society; this dissertation charts the development of ethical research codes within higher education over the past twenty years and thereafter presents a commentary on existing best practices. In so doing, it hopes also to proffer reasoned suggestions as to how existing codes could further improve.
From a methodological viewpoint ‘grounded theory’ is often taken to refer to the theoretical explanations about the social world that emerge from empirical data. This approach was developed by Glaser and Strauss, to conduct research that generates inductive and qualitative theories. In addition, it is widely acknowledged that a more formal definition of thematic analysis existed developed by Boyatzis in 1998. Moreover, his technique recognizes that to analyze appropriately unrelated or dissimilar information; a theme or pattern must be discerned that describes and organizes the possible observations. This dissertation reviews the importance of the work of these authors to prevailing attitudes to the collation of research.
References; Methodology Dissertation Topics. Retrieved from https://ukdiss.com/topic/methodology-topics.php?vref=1